God, AIDS, Africa & HOPE

Reflections / Gedanken

13.10.2009 Nobody dies of AIDS…

What exactly is Aids? What does the infamous HI-virus do? You may well argue that these questions are inane, considering that the pandemic has raged for more than a quarter of a century and that these terms have been widely used and discussed in the mass media. Yet, they are both absolutely relevant questions, because there is still a lot of confusion. The topic is eternally controversial, so its vocabulary tends to be used and manipulated to support one point of view or the other. Many people don’t even know the difference between HIV and Aids, as becomes apparent every time a well-meaning visitor comes to HOPE Cape Town and asks to see the “Aids babies”. The difference between HIV and Aids is critical: Aids is not a pathogen, nor an illness, but a syndrome. When the HI-virus has worn down the immune system, the body has no defences against viruses and bacteria. The patient then clinically enters into the final stage of a process that, without intervention, will inevitably culminate in death. The term commonly used for that stage is “full-blown Aids”. But note that the patient does not die directly from the consequences of the HI-virus’ attack, but from a so-called opportunistic illness which exploits the immune weakness of the body. In Cape Town’s township that opportunistic illness is mostly tuberculosis. But back to the basics: HIV is the acronym for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and refers to the pathogen which first resided in the bodies of Central African monkeys – in peaceful coexistence with the host animals. At some point in the last century the virus (Latin for “poison”) was transmitted to humans, possibly after the consumption of simian meat. Then the laws of evolution kicked in, setting off a battle of life and death because the human immune system can’t expel this invader.
How does one become infected? Most people will immediately answer: by having sex. A simple enough answer to a simple question – and that is precisely why the actual process of infection is usually ignored. To put it in simple terms, nobody gets infected through sex. Rather, the virus is transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids. This delicate distinction may seem pedantic, but in the dialogue about Aids prevention and the stigmatisation of infected people it is crucial.
Sexuality does not just mean the mechanical exchange of bodily fluids; it’s also an expression of affection and love between spouses and life partners. The challenge we are facing is to reduce or even neutralise the inherent dangers of exchanging bodily fluids.
Besides the sexual context, there are other ways of contracting HIV. Every accident, every needle prick, every jointly used razor, every blood transfusion creates the risk of infection.
Blood, sperm, pre-ejaculate and vaginal secretions are the bodily fluids that contain the highest concentration of HIV. Breast milk has a lower density of the virus, but it is transmitted in great volumes during the regular nursing of infants. We can safely ignore all other bodily fluids as potential transmitters. There are no documented cases of tears, saliva or sweat causing contagion.
The virus also can’t penetrate skin. Provided the skin is healthy, blood or sperm present no hazard. The virus can penetrate skin only through open scratches, wounds or injuries to the epidermis.
And it’s not just HIV-negative people who must avoid the exchange of bodily fluids, but also people who already are infected. They can be infected a second time, because the HI-virus mutates when it is being replicated and “individualises” itself in the human body. This medical fact should bust the myth that those who are HIV-positive don’t need to protect themselves anymore. HIV is a so-called retrovirus, which means it cannot replicate by itself. To replicate, the virus needs cells on to which it can attach itself – the white blood cells, the generals of our immune system. They are then converted to produce new HI-viruses, in their thousands per millilitre of blood. These settle in the whole body, but according to latest studies especially in the intestinal tract. If pathogen finds an unsuitable host, the virus loses its potency and dies off. And what happens after infection? In the first stage after contagion many people suffer from flu-like symptoms, swelling of the lymph nodes, and aches in the head, throat and muscles. The virus reproduces in its millions, particularly in the first few weeks after infection – at that time the risk of transmission to others is extremely high. The second stage is called the asymptomatic phase because the infected person now feels completely well. But the virus keeps spreading in the blood, inconspicuously and slowly, and gradually weakens the immune system by corrupting the CD-4 cells, which in healthy bodies help fight off invaders, but now become hosts for the virus through which to multiply. That phase can take years. The infected person is apparently healthy, and the infection can be determined only through an HIV antibody or PCR test.
In the third stage serious symptoms appear: significant weight loss, skin fungi, herpes, skin ulcers like Kaposi’s sarcoma, dysentery, sustained fever and so on. In the fourth and final stage the virus finally conquers the immune system, and the patient becomes susceptible to serious illnesses such as tuberculosis, though even harmless infections can be lethal.
The majority of antiretroviral medicines on the market stop the reproduction of the virus in the white blood cells. But pathogens that proliferate at a rapid pace also make “mistakes” – that’s how genetic mutations of the virus occur. These mutated strains of HIV, creating what is known as resistance, can compromise the efficacy of the antiretroviral drugs. That’s why it is important to inhibit the multiplication of the pathogens in first place. If fewer viruses are produced, the possibility of mutation decreases. That can be achieved only through a fixed regimen of dosages of antiretroviral agents in the body. There are two reasons why no method of removing the virus from the body has been found so far: firstly, the virologists don’t know yet exactly where in the body all the pathogens are hosted; secondly, the virus can pretend to be “sleeping”.
Recent research has intensified to combine medications with a view to easing the use and load of the pills. The product Atripla, for example, covers the necessary daily cocktail of medications with a single pill.
In America a drug going by the name MK-0518 has been developed. It inhibits the so-called integrase enzyme of the HI virus – the integrase adds viral genetic material into the host cell’s DNA, which then allows the infected cell to produce new copies of the virus. Parallel to that pharmaceutical research,
testing continues on microbicide gels which can be applied to the vagina before sexual intercourse to kill the virus before it can reach the blood stream. Research is also being conducted into anti-HIV vaccines, but the scientists dampen our hopes: it might be ten years or more before there will be any breakthrough. Even though after the many reports about the vaccine trial in Thailand.. there is a long way to go…

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, , , , , , ,

22.09.2009 more fundamental questions…

In the last days I described my stance on mandatory testing and the pre-testing counseling. Having now more time to dedicate my energy towards the HIV/AIDS portfolio, there are more topics I feel are necessary to persue in the coming months and years. I have spoken already about the need to end the stigmatization within the health sector itself.  On the political front I can forsee to look more intensive into the question of travel freedom of people living with the virus. The ban to visit certain countries or the ban to get a work permit if you are HIV positive as you can find it in Australia, Singapore and many other countries is not only a sign of a lack of maturity of politicians in the respective countries but also a clear violation of human rights. I am aware that the UN, but also the German “AIDS Hilfe” is dealing with the issue, but we should all join hands and start to pressurize political systems allowing such violations of dignity and human rights.
In some of the blogs I mention the work with HIV positive priests and religious as well as seminarians. This is indeed a very tricky question and I hope that in October, when I am in Rom to meet together with Joachim Franz with the papal council for health care workers, to get this council on board to have a hard look how we deal with HIV and AIDS in our own ranks. Is the refusal to take a HIV positive person into e.g. monkhood or a seminary not a sign of fear and immaturity of the church? Are we as a church really allowed to deal with infected people in refusing them to follow their vocation? I am sure that God does not mind the status of a person. So we also shouldn’t mind the HIV status of a person. What kind of AIDS policies are regulating the life of the church and their institutions? Do we advocate the acceptation of people living with the virus only for the area outside the church? Tough questions, but we owe it the greater love of God to check our own balances on those questions and see whether they add up.

The ethical question of ceasing treatment if somebody does not adhere at all – also a tricky question. I mentioned the criminal law as a tool of prevention, which I find absolutely unreasonable in the way it is administered in most countries, specially also here in Africa.

Those are some of the questions in my mind, where I would like to contribute towards a solution which ends the madness of stigmatization and discrimination, which forces governments and churches to act reasonable and always upholding the dignity and human rights of every person.

Filed under: General, HIV and AIDS, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, Networking, Politics and Society, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

21.09.2009 Stop pre-test counselling

After writing about the mandatory testing law to be introduced by our MEC of Health next year – at least that is his plan – I reflected more on it and I came to the conclusion, that mandatory testing indeed once again would medically stigmatize people.  Patients are entitled to refuse examinations and treatment options – and that also goes in my humble opinion for HIV and AIDS.  When I go to a doctor and he recommends a full blood test it is on me to say “yes” or “no” – if I am diagnosed with cancer it is on me whether I chose a treatment option or I let the cancer have its way without any further treatment. So I would suggest to include a HIV test into the normal full blood test, but with a clear “opt out” option.

And consequently  I would do away with the pre-test-counselling. I think it is rather a nice way of keeping thousands of people voluntarily or with low pay busy, but it once again segregates this virus. No one is counseled according to a book when he or she might have cancer or any other disease. It is done after a proper diagnose has been done – and that is how we should also treat the patient, who get’s a positive result.  I strongly believe that with all the – very often very unprofessional counseling – we scare people away and make the situation more complicated than it is necessary. Again, if somebody wants to have more information before a test – so it be like with every other test; but not more and not less. Let’s start to de-stigmatise HIV first in the medical field…

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Prevention, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, Reflection, , , , , , , , , , ,

20.09.2009 Beyond the condoms…

Having written a blog entry about the criminalization of  HIV and seeing the response so far, I just realise that there are quite some moral and ethical issues we still have to deal with in the fields of HIV and AIDS. One is used to hear only about the condom story when talking about or talking with the Catholic Church, but there are more things coming to my mind:
– Equality of man and women
– Criminal Code and HIV
– Travel restrictions or travel ban and human rights
– Commencement and possible cessation of treatment
– Dealing of the Catholic Church (or any church) with their own clergy being positive
– Understanding of sexuality in the context of Europe, Africa and Asia as well as Latin America
– Abstinence only or diverse approach towards prevention work

I wish I could convince the German and the Southern African Bishops Conference to set up a study group on all these issues and surely a couple of more questions, which will come up in a brainstorming session. It would make such a difference.

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Prevention, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, Politics and Society, Reflection, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20.09.2009 Mandatory testing

Mandatory HIV testing ‘violates their rights’
(IOL website 19.09.09)

Mandatory testing for HIV would violate the rights of people, the SA Human Rights Commission said on Friday. This comes after provincial Health MEC Theuns Botha announced plans to introduce legislation in the Western Cape to have every patient at every health facility tested for the virus. Botha says the move is the final onslaught in the fight against the disease.
Currently 200 000 people in the Western Cape are estimated to be HIV-positive and 63 000 are on ARV treatment. Botha has started the ball rolling to draw up legislation which he anticipates will be ready by next March. He said the legislation was necessary as people had “avoidance” behaviour and chose to not be tested.
Dr Mark Heywood, of the Aids Law Project, agrees with the rights commission. The Treatment Action Campaign was divided on the issue, spokesperson Rebecca Hodes said. Steven Ngobeni, the national HIV and Aids health rights co-ordinator for the commission, said yesterday mandatory testing “does not make sense”. People, he said, often did not know their rights, counselling at voluntary testing centres was not up to scratch and universal access to treatment was not readily available.  Both Ngobeni and Heywood said the provincial government would make a greater impact by educating people about HIV and testing.  Heywood said: “There is no way that you could justify a law to introduce mandatory testing.” It was also wrong from a public health and HIV management perspective.  “I would suggest a public campaign to get people to go for testing. Right now people are avoiding being tested as there is too little information and routine offerings are haphazard.”  He said a law would not work. “People will still be scared of a diagnosis and they could in fact completely avoid health care facilities.”  The TAC’s Hodes said mandatory testing in Botswana had been successful but it had been rolled out as part of a broader ARV treatment campaign.
“Some say mandatory testing will increase stigma, others say it will destigmatise the disease. But if testing becomes mandatory there should be proper support,” she said.  Botha said on Friday it was a two-pronged approach – testing as well as getting people into treatment sooner.   “We would introduce people much earlier into a treatment programme,” he said.

An interesting article and I would like to add: We have to make HIV testing as normal as any other testing. Which would mean in a first step to remove all “extra doors & extra benches” for HIV testing, counseling, treatment and so on..” I even think we can stop the pretest counseling. Like any other diseases we have to advise after a diagnose and not before. If somebody has cancer, we also do not put him or her through a lengthy intimate process before he or she is allowed to have a result.

Being HIV positive is a medical condition in this frameset, let’s treat it as such.

Filed under: HIV Prevention, HIV Treatment, Politics and Society, Society and living environment, , , , , , , , , ,

Blog Categories

Follow God, AIDS, Africa & HOPE on WordPress.com

You can share this blog in many ways..

Bookmark and Share

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,711 other subscribers

Translation – Deutsch? Française? Espanol? …

The translation button is located on each single blog page, Copy the text, click the button and paste it for instant translation:
Website Translation Widget

or for the translation of the front page:

* Click for Translation

Copyright

© Rev Fr Stefan Hippler and HIV, AIDS and HOPE.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Rev Fr Stefan Hippler and HIV, AIDS and HOPE with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

This not withstanding the following applies:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.