God, AIDS, Africa & HOPE

Reflections / Gedanken

21.10.2009 More than four million…

More than 4 million people in low and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the close of 2008, representing a 36% increase in one year and a ten-fold increase over five years, according to a report released by the WHO, UNICEF and UNAIDS.

Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector highlights other gains, including expanded HIV testing and counselling and improved access to services to prevent HIV transmission from mother to child.

“This report shows tremendous progress in the global HIV/AIDS response,” said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan. “But we need to do more. At least 5 million people living with HIV still do not have access to life-prolonging treatment and care. Prevention services fail to reach many in need. Governments and international partners must accelerate their efforts to achieve universal access to treatment.”

Treatment and care

Access to antiretroviral therapy continues to expand at a rapid rate. Of the estimated 9.5 million people in need of treatment in 2008 in low- and middle-income countries, 42% had access, up from 33% in 2007. The greatest progress was seen in sub-Saharan Africa, where two-thirds of all HIV infections occur.

Prices of the most commonly used antiretroviral drugs have declined significantly in recent years, contributing to wider availability of treatment. The cost of most first-line regimens decreased by 10-40% between 2006 and 2008. However, second-line regimens continue to be expensive. Despite recent progress, access to treatment services is falling far short of need and the global economic crisis has raised concerns about their sustainability. Many patients are being diagnosed at a late stage of disease progression resulting in delayed initiation of ART and high rates of mortality in the first year of treatment.

Testing and counselling

Recent data indicate increasing availability of HIV testing and counselling services. In 66 reporting countries, the number of health facilities providing such services increased by about 35% between 2007 and 2008. Testing and counselling services are also being used by an increasing number of people. In 39 countries, the total reported number of HIV tests performed more than doubled between 2007 and 2008. Ninety-three percent of all countries that reported data across all regions provided free HIV testing through public sector health facilities in 2008.

Nevertheless, the majority of those living with HIV remain unaware of their HIV status. Low awareness of personal risk of HIV infection and fear of stigma and discrimination account, in part, for low uptake of testing services.

Women and children

In 2008, access to HIV services for women and children improved. Approximately 45% of HIV-positive pregnant women received antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV transmission to their children, up from 35% in 2007. Some 21% of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received an HIV test, up from 15% in 2007. More children are benefiting from paediatric antiretroviral therapy programmes: the number of children under 15 years of age who received ART rose from approximately 198 000 in 2007 to 275 700 in 2008, reaching 38% of those in need.

Globally, AIDS remains the leading cause of mortality among women of reproductive age. “Although there is increasing emphasis on women and children in the global HIV/AIDS response, the disease continues to have a devastating impact on their health, livelihood and survival,” said Ann M. Veneman, UNICEF Executive Director.

Most-at-risk populations

In 2008, more data became available on access to HIV services for populations at high risk of HIV infection, including sex workers, men who have sex with men and injecting drug users. While HIV interventions are expanding in some settings, population groups at high risk of HIV infection continue to face technical, legal and sociocultural barriers in accessing health care services. “All indications point to the number of people needing treatment rising dramatically over the next few years,” said Michel Sidibé, Executive Director of UNAIDS. “Ensuring equitable access will be one of our primary concerns and UNAIDS will continue to act as a voice for the voiceless, ensuring that marginalized groups and people most vulnerable to HIV infection have access to the services that are so vital to their wellbeing and to that of their families and communities.”

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Prevention, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, , , , , , , , , ,

13.10.2009 Nobody dies of AIDS…

What exactly is Aids? What does the infamous HI-virus do? You may well argue that these questions are inane, considering that the pandemic has raged for more than a quarter of a century and that these terms have been widely used and discussed in the mass media. Yet, they are both absolutely relevant questions, because there is still a lot of confusion. The topic is eternally controversial, so its vocabulary tends to be used and manipulated to support one point of view or the other. Many people don’t even know the difference between HIV and Aids, as becomes apparent every time a well-meaning visitor comes to HOPE Cape Town and asks to see the “Aids babies”. The difference between HIV and Aids is critical: Aids is not a pathogen, nor an illness, but a syndrome. When the HI-virus has worn down the immune system, the body has no defences against viruses and bacteria. The patient then clinically enters into the final stage of a process that, without intervention, will inevitably culminate in death. The term commonly used for that stage is “full-blown Aids”. But note that the patient does not die directly from the consequences of the HI-virus’ attack, but from a so-called opportunistic illness which exploits the immune weakness of the body. In Cape Town’s township that opportunistic illness is mostly tuberculosis. But back to the basics: HIV is the acronym for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and refers to the pathogen which first resided in the bodies of Central African monkeys – in peaceful coexistence with the host animals. At some point in the last century the virus (Latin for “poison”) was transmitted to humans, possibly after the consumption of simian meat. Then the laws of evolution kicked in, setting off a battle of life and death because the human immune system can’t expel this invader.
How does one become infected? Most people will immediately answer: by having sex. A simple enough answer to a simple question – and that is precisely why the actual process of infection is usually ignored. To put it in simple terms, nobody gets infected through sex. Rather, the virus is transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids. This delicate distinction may seem pedantic, but in the dialogue about Aids prevention and the stigmatisation of infected people it is crucial.
Sexuality does not just mean the mechanical exchange of bodily fluids; it’s also an expression of affection and love between spouses and life partners. The challenge we are facing is to reduce or even neutralise the inherent dangers of exchanging bodily fluids.
Besides the sexual context, there are other ways of contracting HIV. Every accident, every needle prick, every jointly used razor, every blood transfusion creates the risk of infection.
Blood, sperm, pre-ejaculate and vaginal secretions are the bodily fluids that contain the highest concentration of HIV. Breast milk has a lower density of the virus, but it is transmitted in great volumes during the regular nursing of infants. We can safely ignore all other bodily fluids as potential transmitters. There are no documented cases of tears, saliva or sweat causing contagion.
The virus also can’t penetrate skin. Provided the skin is healthy, blood or sperm present no hazard. The virus can penetrate skin only through open scratches, wounds or injuries to the epidermis.
And it’s not just HIV-negative people who must avoid the exchange of bodily fluids, but also people who already are infected. They can be infected a second time, because the HI-virus mutates when it is being replicated and “individualises” itself in the human body. This medical fact should bust the myth that those who are HIV-positive don’t need to protect themselves anymore. HIV is a so-called retrovirus, which means it cannot replicate by itself. To replicate, the virus needs cells on to which it can attach itself – the white blood cells, the generals of our immune system. They are then converted to produce new HI-viruses, in their thousands per millilitre of blood. These settle in the whole body, but according to latest studies especially in the intestinal tract. If pathogen finds an unsuitable host, the virus loses its potency and dies off. And what happens after infection? In the first stage after contagion many people suffer from flu-like symptoms, swelling of the lymph nodes, and aches in the head, throat and muscles. The virus reproduces in its millions, particularly in the first few weeks after infection – at that time the risk of transmission to others is extremely high. The second stage is called the asymptomatic phase because the infected person now feels completely well. But the virus keeps spreading in the blood, inconspicuously and slowly, and gradually weakens the immune system by corrupting the CD-4 cells, which in healthy bodies help fight off invaders, but now become hosts for the virus through which to multiply. That phase can take years. The infected person is apparently healthy, and the infection can be determined only through an HIV antibody or PCR test.
In the third stage serious symptoms appear: significant weight loss, skin fungi, herpes, skin ulcers like Kaposi’s sarcoma, dysentery, sustained fever and so on. In the fourth and final stage the virus finally conquers the immune system, and the patient becomes susceptible to serious illnesses such as tuberculosis, though even harmless infections can be lethal.
The majority of antiretroviral medicines on the market stop the reproduction of the virus in the white blood cells. But pathogens that proliferate at a rapid pace also make “mistakes” – that’s how genetic mutations of the virus occur. These mutated strains of HIV, creating what is known as resistance, can compromise the efficacy of the antiretroviral drugs. That’s why it is important to inhibit the multiplication of the pathogens in first place. If fewer viruses are produced, the possibility of mutation decreases. That can be achieved only through a fixed regimen of dosages of antiretroviral agents in the body. There are two reasons why no method of removing the virus from the body has been found so far: firstly, the virologists don’t know yet exactly where in the body all the pathogens are hosted; secondly, the virus can pretend to be “sleeping”.
Recent research has intensified to combine medications with a view to easing the use and load of the pills. The product Atripla, for example, covers the necessary daily cocktail of medications with a single pill.
In America a drug going by the name MK-0518 has been developed. It inhibits the so-called integrase enzyme of the HI virus – the integrase adds viral genetic material into the host cell’s DNA, which then allows the infected cell to produce new copies of the virus. Parallel to that pharmaceutical research,
testing continues on microbicide gels which can be applied to the vagina before sexual intercourse to kill the virus before it can reach the blood stream. Research is also being conducted into anti-HIV vaccines, but the scientists dampen our hopes: it might be ten years or more before there will be any breakthrough. Even though after the many reports about the vaccine trial in Thailand.. there is a long way to go…

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, , , , , , ,

24.09.2009 HIV & vaccine

An experimental HIV vaccine has for the first time cut the risk of infection, researchers say.

Half of the volunteers were given the vaccine, while the other half were given a placebo – and all were given counselling on HIV/Aids prevention.

The vaccine – a combination of two earlier experimental vaccines – was given to 16,000 people in Thailand, in the largest ever such vaccine trial. Researchers found that it reduced by nearly a third the risk of contracting HIV, the virus that leads to Aids. It has been hailed as a significant, scientific breakthrough, but a global vaccine is still some way off. The study was carried out by the US army and the Thai government over seven years on volunteers – all HIV-negative men and women aged between 18 and 30 – in parts of Thailand. The vaccine was a combination of two older vaccines that on their own had not cut infection rates. Participants were tested for HIV infection every six months for three years.

The results found that the chances of catching HIV were 31.2% less for those who had taken the vaccine – with 74 people who did not get the vaccine infected and 51 of the vaccinated group infected. The vaccine is based on B and E strains of HIV that most commonly circulate in Thailand not the C strain which predominates in Africa. “This result is tantalisingly encouraging. The numbers are small and the difference may have been due to chance, but this finding is the first positive news in the Aids vaccine field for a decade,” said Dr Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet medical journal. “We should be cautious, but hopeful. The discovery needs urgent replication and investigation.” Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases said: “For the first time, an investigational HIV vaccine has demonstrated some ability to prevent HIV infection among vaccinated individuals. “Additional research is needed to better understand how this vaccine regimen reduced the risk of HIV infection, but this is certainly an encouraging advance for the HIV vaccine field. The findings were hailed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Aids (UN/Aids). They said while the results were “characterised as modestly protective… [they] have instilled new hope in the HIV vaccine research field”. Some 33 million people around the world have HIV.
Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/8272113.stm

Encouraging news indeed but also we have to be careful: too often first results did not bring further good news when it came to vaccines in this field. A vaccine is still far away and 31% is not the world. It is a first step in a whole set of steps to understand the dynamics of a possible vaccine solution.  So it is exciting news but we should wait and see the next steps to be sure that we are on the right track. I know I sound pessimistic, but I guess, I would describe it rather as careful. Too much hope produces too much frustration afterwards. Lets stay realistic. laude the researchers and encourage them not to give up the hope of finding a vaccine, be it preventative or therapeutic. Both is needed in our days.

Filed under: HIV and AIDS, HIV Prevention, Medical and Research, ,

23.09.2009 Doing good..

Doing good isn’t that easy. How often do we have requests from people from overseas wanting to do something good. This means in many cases they envisage themselves helping HOPE Cape Town in some practical and personal way. This is difficult in many ways. HOPE Cape Town is not a children’s orphanage in the wild of Africa, but a professional organisation working in state institutions like primary health care facilities (also called township clinics) or Tygerberg Children’s Hospital. We simply cannot take everybody as a volunteer and this creates very often disappointment. South Africa too has rules and regulations, and very often, the question of a working visa ends the dream of doing good. But also being in the country guarantees not a volunteer post. The person must be suitable, the work must be meaningful and beneficial to the causes of HOPE Cape Town and its’ patients and clients.

So we try to balance every request and look for its merit. But even if it would fit, an organisation like HOPE Cape Town can only take a certain amount of volunteers at a time. There must be supervision and guidance. We have in the moment two volunteers at any given time from “weltwaerts” which is an initiative from the German Government to give young people a chance to discover their talents while working abroad. Add one or two more and we are already at the end of our capacity.

It is interesting to see that also elderly persons want to contribute and we see more and more requests from those, who are retired and seek for a meaningful purpose for the years after work. And as Cape Town is a prime destiny on the world map, there are months were we have to answer every day several requests. This leaves me for example sometimes a bit unhappy to deny such requests as I am sure the person on the other side of the world just want to do good. And I have to concede that wanting to do good is getting more and more difficult in our days.

So how does HOPE Cape Town choses its volunteers?
After getting an application we are looking whether the person can fund himself/herself completely and whether the skills or requirements are fitting in with the requirements of HOPE Cape Town and its actual work. If it matches and a place is available the person gets the go ahead to come and join HOPE Cape Town for a certain period of time. The volunteer will have a supervisor whom he or she reports to on a regular base.

Besides the volunteers we also have most times medical students doing an elective student programme and we more and more have also PhD students who make use of our connections into the township communities for their research. It goes without say that all is done in accordance with the regulations of the ethical committee of the University of Stellenbosch if so required.

Filed under: General, HOPE Cape Town Association & Trust, Medical and Research, Networking, , , , , , , , , ,

22.09.2009 more fundamental questions…

In the last days I described my stance on mandatory testing and the pre-testing counseling. Having now more time to dedicate my energy towards the HIV/AIDS portfolio, there are more topics I feel are necessary to persue in the coming months and years. I have spoken already about the need to end the stigmatization within the health sector itself.  On the political front I can forsee to look more intensive into the question of travel freedom of people living with the virus. The ban to visit certain countries or the ban to get a work permit if you are HIV positive as you can find it in Australia, Singapore and many other countries is not only a sign of a lack of maturity of politicians in the respective countries but also a clear violation of human rights. I am aware that the UN, but also the German “AIDS Hilfe” is dealing with the issue, but we should all join hands and start to pressurize political systems allowing such violations of dignity and human rights.
In some of the blogs I mention the work with HIV positive priests and religious as well as seminarians. This is indeed a very tricky question and I hope that in October, when I am in Rom to meet together with Joachim Franz with the papal council for health care workers, to get this council on board to have a hard look how we deal with HIV and AIDS in our own ranks. Is the refusal to take a HIV positive person into e.g. monkhood or a seminary not a sign of fear and immaturity of the church? Are we as a church really allowed to deal with infected people in refusing them to follow their vocation? I am sure that God does not mind the status of a person. So we also shouldn’t mind the HIV status of a person. What kind of AIDS policies are regulating the life of the church and their institutions? Do we advocate the acceptation of people living with the virus only for the area outside the church? Tough questions, but we owe it the greater love of God to check our own balances on those questions and see whether they add up.

The ethical question of ceasing treatment if somebody does not adhere at all – also a tricky question. I mentioned the criminal law as a tool of prevention, which I find absolutely unreasonable in the way it is administered in most countries, specially also here in Africa.

Those are some of the questions in my mind, where I would like to contribute towards a solution which ends the madness of stigmatization and discrimination, which forces governments and churches to act reasonable and always upholding the dignity and human rights of every person.

Filed under: General, HIV and AIDS, HIV Treatment, Medical and Research, Networking, Politics and Society, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Blog Categories

Follow God, AIDS, Africa & HOPE on WordPress.com

You can share this blog in many ways..

Bookmark and Share

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,711 other subscribers

Translation – Deutsch? Française? Espanol? …

The translation button is located on each single blog page, Copy the text, click the button and paste it for instant translation:
Website Translation Widget

or for the translation of the front page:

* Click for Translation

Copyright

© Rev Fr Stefan Hippler and HIV, AIDS and HOPE.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Rev Fr Stefan Hippler and HIV, AIDS and HOPE with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

This not withstanding the following applies:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.